Woodmere North Investment Fund Ltd. v. SLT Warehouse

364 So. 2d 802, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17051
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 14, 1978·No. No. FF-465·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record-on-appeal and the briefs filed by able counsel and determine therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court erred in the manner alleged. We further find that nothing will be added to the jurisprudence of this state by a meticulous recitation of the facts giving rise to this appeal nor by a discussion of the law applicable to those facts. The well reasoned and carefully articulated final judgment of the trial court which is here appealed is therefore

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodmere North Investment Fund Ltd. v. SLT Warehouse, 364 So. 2d 802, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17051 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

364 So. 2d 802 (Woodmere North Investment Fund Ltd. v. SLT Warehouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baumgartner Const. Co., Inc. v. Harrell
364 So. 2d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)