Woodmen Investment Ass'n v. Grand Junction

51 Colo. 353
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1911
DocketNo. 6583
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 Colo. 353 (Woodmen Investment Ass'n v. Grand Junction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodmen Investment Ass'n v. Grand Junction, 51 Colo. 353 (Colo. 1911).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Hill

delivered the opinion of the court;

On February 5th, 1908, by proceedings on certiorari the plaintiff in error, as relator, commenced this action in the lower court against the defendants in error, as respondents, to have declared null and void and of no effect, t woliquor licenses issued June 13th, 1907, and September 10th, 1907, to W. A. Lynch and Company for the sale of intoxicating liquors in the City of Grand Junction. The petition discloses that each license was for a period of six months, both of which have long since expired. The principal questions sought to be reviewed are questions of facts which may never arise again in a similar case; in any event no relief could be given to the plaintiff in error were a decision rendered in its favor. The licenses having long since expired, a trial to declare them null and void would accomplish nothing. A writ of error may be dismissed, if, pending a decision, an event occurs which makes a determination of it unnecessary, or renders it impossible for the courts to grant effectual relief.— Knowles v. Harrington, 45 Colo. 346; State Equalization Board v. People, 30 Colo. 271; Floyd v. Cochran, 24 Colo. 489; Hunter v. Dickinson, 3 Colo. App. 372; 3 Cyc. 188.

For these reasons this writ of error is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Mr. Justice Gabbert and Mt. Justice Musser ¡concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolfe v. Bauer
66 Colo. 153 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1919)
Burns v. National Mining, Tunnel & Land Co.
23 Colo. App. 545 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Colo. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodmen-investment-assn-v-grand-junction-colo-1911.