Woodmansee v. Kennicutt

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 667
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1885·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed on che opinion of the county judge, (Richardson v. Northrup, 66 Barb., 85; Hoyle v. The New York Central, 28 Hun, 363.) Held, that it does not appear that the justice set off the costs of the judgment against the defendant, as against the costs in the judgment, in favor of the other defendant. The words u two dollars and twelve cents in favor of plaintiff ” bear no such construction. They may mean the balance going to the plaintiff after the justice ‘ has deducted his foes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodmansee v. Kennicutt, 42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 667 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 667 (Woodmansee v. Kennicutt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Northrup
66 Barb. 85 (New York Supreme Court, 1867)