Woodmansee v. Kennicutt

New York Supreme Court

Woodmansee v. Kennicutt

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 667

DecidedJanuary 15, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 667 (Woodmansee v. Kennicutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodmansee v. Kennicutt, 42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 667 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed on che opinion of the county judge, (Richardson v. Northrup, 66 Barb., 85; Hoyle v. The New York Central, 28 Hun, 363.) Held, that it does not appear that the justice set off the costs of the judgment against the defendant, as against the costs in the judgment, in favor of the other defendant. The words u two dollars and twelve cents in favor of plaintiff ” bear no such construction. They may mean the balance going to the plaintiff after the justice ‘ has deducted his foes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed on che opinion of the county judge, (Richardson v. Northrup, 66 Barb., 85; Hoyle v. The New York Central, 28 Hun, 363.) Held, that it does not appear that the justice set off the costs of the judgment against the defendant, as against the costs in the judgment, in favor of the other defendant. The words u two dollars and twelve cents in favor of plaintiff ” bear no such construction. They may mean the balance going to the plaintiff after the justice ‘ has deducted his foes.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodmansee-v-kennicutt-nysupct-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack