Woodmancy v. . Woodmancy
85 N.E. 1109, 192 N.Y. 562, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 968
This text of 85 N.E. 1109 (Woodmancy v. . Woodmancy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Woodmancy v. . Woodmancy, 85 N.E. 1109, 192 N.Y. 562, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 968 (N.Y. 1908).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner and Hiscock, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
85 N.E. 1109, 192 N.Y. 562, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodmancy-v-woodmancy-ny-1908.