Woodman v. Stearns

Supreme Court of Vermont

Woodman v. Stearns

23 Vt. 655

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided September 15, 1851·Published

Opinion

By the Court!

We understand the auditor in this case to have found, that Lancaster’s charge for the work done by the plaintiff was unreasonable, — that it was $5,00, when it should have been but $4,00. And this we can only suppose is with reference to the dealing between the parties, and in the mode of payment there contemplated ; otherwise it would have no proper application to the case. And the cash price for this same work seems to have been much less, — $2,50 or $3,00. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court!

We understand the auditor in this case to have found, that Lancaster’s charge for the work done by the plaintiff was unreasonable, — that it was $5,00, when it should have been but $4,00. And this we can only suppose is with reference to the dealing between the parties, and in the mode of payment there contemplated ; otherwise it would have no proper application to the case. And the cash price for this same work seems to have been much less, — $2,50 or $3,00. Judgment affirmed.

Woodman v. Stearns, 23 Vt. 655 (Vt. 1851).

Pincite

23 Vt. 655 (Woodman v. Stearns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.