Woodman v. State
187 So. 3d 369, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4240, 2016 WL 1062771
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order reinstating and modifying Appellant’s probation following an open plea. However, because the written order on appeal does not set forth the specific condition of probation that was violated, we remand for the entry of a proper order that specifies the condition of probation violated. See Perez v. State, 958 So.2d 1076, 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of proper order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodman v. State, 187 So. 3d 369, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4240, 2016 WL 1062771 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
187 So. 3d 369 (Woodman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perez v. State
958 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)