Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Woodman v. State

Woodman v. State

187 So. 3d 369, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4240, 2016 WL 1062771
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 18, 2016
DocketNo. 5D15-1946
StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 3d 369 (Woodman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodman v. State, 187 So. 3d 369, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4240, 2016 WL 1062771 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order reinstating and modifying Appellant’s probation following an open plea. However, because the written order on appeal does not set forth the specific condition of probation that was violated, we remand for the entry of a proper order that specifies the condition of probation violated. See Perez v. State, 958 So.2d 1076, 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of proper order.

BERGER, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perez v. State
958 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 So. 3d 369, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4240, 2016 WL 1062771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodman-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.