Woodman v. Savage
This text of 414 So. 2d 590 (Woodman v. Savage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant correctly contends that the trial court erred in setting aside a default judgment entered in his favor, where appel-lee’s motion for relief failed to allege facts demonstrating the existence of a meritorious defense. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court with directions that appellee be permitted to make such amendments to her motion for relief as are necessary to conform to the law stated in Scott v. Premium Development, Inc., 328 So.2d 557 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), and Bay Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Carroll, 352 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
414 So. 2d 590, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodman-v-savage-fladistctapp-1982.