Woodman v. Rowe

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Woodman v. Rowe

59 N.H. 453

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedDecember 5, 1879

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 N.H. 453 (Woodman v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodman v. Rowe, 59 N.H. 453 (N.H. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The plaintiff’s guardian or next friend could be made a party by an amendment relating back to the commencement of the suit. But the plaintiff being now of age, an amendment is not necessary.

The parties are bound by their settlement of the estate without administration. Hibbard v. Kent, 15 N. H. 516; Clarke v. Clay, 31 N. H. 393; Ceorge v. Johnson, 45 N. H. 456; Mercer v. Pike, 58 N. H. 286.

Bemurrer overruled.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

The plaintiff’s guardian or next friend could be made a party by an amendment relating back to the commencement of the suit. But the plaintiff being now of age, an amendment is not necessary.

The parties are bound by their settlement of the estate without administration. Hibbard v. Kent, 15 N. H. 516; Clarke v. Clay, 31 N. H. 393; Ceorge v. Johnson, 45 N. H. 456; Mercer v. Pike, 58 N. H. 286.

Bemurrer overruled.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 N.H. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodman-v-rowe-nh-1879.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack