Woodman v. Goodenough

New York Supreme Court

Woodman v. Goodenough

18 Abb. Pr. 265

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1865

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 18 Abb. Pr. 265 (Woodman v. Goodenough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodman v. Goodenough, 18 Abb. Pr. 265 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

Ingraham, J. (orally.)

In proceedings under section 292, no order can be made affecting the rights of third parties. They have the right to be examined before such an order is made. If the plaintiff desires such an order, he must proceed under section 294. There is another fatal objection to the order as it stands. The order provides for the payment of -moneys hereafter to become due, as the goods shall be manufactured under the debtor’s patent. RTo such prospective order can be made in supplementary proceedings.

Motion granted, but without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingraham, J. (orally.)

In proceedings under section 292, no order can be made affecting the rights of third parties. They have the right to be examined before such an order is made. If the plaintiff desires such an order, he must proceed under section 294. There is another fatal objection to the order as it stands. The order provides for the payment of -moneys hereafter to become due, as the goods shall be manufactured under the debtor’s patent. RTo such prospective order can be made in supplementary proceedings.

Motion granted, but without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Abb. Pr. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodman-v-goodenough-nysupct-1865.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack