Woodman v. Goodenough

18 Abb. Pr. 265
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1865·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Ingraham, J. (orally.)

In proceedings under section 292, no order can be made affecting the rights of third parties. They have the right to be examined before such an order is made. If the plaintiff desires such an order, he must proceed under section 294. There is another fatal objection to the order as it stands. The order provides for the payment of -moneys hereafter to become due, as the goods shall be manufactured under the debtor’s patent. RTo such prospective order can be made in supplementary proceedings.

Motion granted, but without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodman v. Goodenough, 18 Abb. Pr. 265 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1865).

18 Abb. Pr. 265 (Woodman v. Goodenough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dease v. Reese
39 Misc. 657 (New York Supreme Court, 1903)
In re Trustees of the Board of Publication & Sabbath School Work
22 Misc. 645 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
Schenck v. Erwin
17 N.Y.S. 616 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)
Columbian Institute v. Cregan
3 N.Y. St. Rep. 287 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1886)