Woodman Pebbling-Mach. Co. v. Guild

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Woodman Pebbling-Mach. Co. v. Guild

30 F. Cas. 516, 4 Cliff. 185

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

DecidedMay 15, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 30 F. Cas. 516 (Woodman Pebbling-Mach. Co. v. Guild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodman Pebbling-Mach. Co. v. Guild, 30 F. Cas. 516, 4 Cliff. 185 (circtdma 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

CLIFFORD, Circuit Justice.

Irrespective of the decision of the supreme court in the case of Stimpson v. Woodman, 10 Wall. [77 U. S.) 120, the court here would be of the opinion that the complainants are entitled to a decree that their patent is valid, and for an account and an injunction; but we are both of the opinion that the case is controlled by the principles of that decision, and that the bill of complaint must be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CLIFFORD, Circuit Justice.

Irrespective of the decision of the supreme court in the case of Stimpson v. Woodman, 10 Wall. [77 U. S.) 120, the court here would be of the opinion that the complainants are entitled to a decree that their patent is valid, and for an account and an injunction; but we are both of the opinion that the case is controlled by the principles of that decision, and that the bill of complaint must be dismissed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 F. Cas. 516, 4 Cliff. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodman-pebbling-mach-co-v-guild-circtdma-1872.