Woodman Pebbling-Mach. Co. v. Guild

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Woodman Pebbling-Mach. Co. v. Guild

30 F. Cas. 516, 4 Cliff. 185

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts·Decided May 15, 1872·Published

Opinion

CLIFFORD, Circuit Justice.

Irrespective of the decision of the supreme court in the case of Stimpson v. Woodman, 10 Wall. [77 U. S.) 120, the court here would be of the opinion that the complainants are entitled to a decree that their patent is valid, and for an account and an injunction; but we are both of the opinion that the case is controlled by the principles of that decision, and that the bill of complaint must be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CLIFFORD, Circuit Justice.

Irrespective of the decision of the supreme court in the case of Stimpson v. Woodman, 10 Wall. [77 U. S.) 120, the court here would be of the opinion that the complainants are entitled to a decree that their patent is valid, and for an account and an injunction; but we are both of the opinion that the case is controlled by the principles of that decision, and that the bill of complaint must be dismissed with costs.

Woodman Pebbling-Mach. Co. v. Guild, 30 F. Cas. 516, 4 Cliff. 185 (circtdma 1872).

Pincite

30 F. Cas. 516 (Woodman Pebbling-Mach. Co. v. Guild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.