Woodlock v. Combs

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Woodlock v. Combs

6 N.W. 362, 49 Wis. 659, 1880 Wisc. LEXIS 100

DecidedJune 23, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.W. 362 (Woodlock v. Combs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodlock v. Combs, 6 N.W. 362, 49 Wis. 659, 1880 Wisc. LEXIS 100 (Wis. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

OetoN, J.

There is neither a certificate of the judge before whom this case was tried, nor stipulation of the parties, that the bill of exceptions contains all of the evidence given on the trial; and therefore the exceptions taken to the refusal of the court to grant a nonsuit, or to the instructions given to the jury, are of no avail, and cannot be considered by this court. Paine v. Smith, 32 Wis., 335. For the same reason, the jury must be presumed to have found upon sufficient evidence, that the services were rendered upon the contract, and that such contract was made with the plaintiff, and that it was performed by the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint, as well as every other fact necessary to the plaintiff’s recovery in the case. Eaton et al. v. Woolly, 28 Wis., 628.

No error is apparent from the record as made.

By the Court. — The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OetoN, J.

There is neither a certificate of the judge before whom this case was tried, nor stipulation of the parties, that the bill of exceptions contains all of the evidence given on the trial; and therefore the exceptions taken to the refusal of the court to grant a nonsuit, or to the instructions given to the jury, are of no avail, and cannot be considered by this court. Paine v. Smith, 32 Wis., 335. For the same reason, the jury must be presumed to have found upon sufficient evidence, that the services were rendered upon the contract, and that such contract was made with the plaintiff, and that it was performed by the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint, as well as every other fact necessary to the plaintiff’s recovery in the case. Eaton et al. v. Woolly, 28 Wis., 628.

No error is apparent from the record as made.

By the Court. — The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.W. 362, 49 Wis. 659, 1880 Wisc. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodlock-v-combs-wis-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack