Woodlin Blackiston v. Hynsons
This text of 1 Del. 224 (Woodlin Blackiston v. Hynsons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the court said in relation to the taking of depositions;
That after depositions had been returned and published and readhy the opposite party or his counsel, it was not competent for such party to file interrogatories and take further testimony. He must file his interrogatories before publication of the depositions on the other side; or if published, before reading them; otherwise the testimony will de rejected.
*225 If the competency of a witness is to be attacked it must be done by filing exceptions, that the other party may have notice and prepare to support his witness.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Del. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodlin-blackiston-v-hynsons-delsuperct-1833.