Woodlands Comm. Bank v. State of Nev. Bd. of Finance

Nevada Supreme Court

Woodlands Comm. Bank v. State of Nev. Bd. of Finance

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided July 31, 2015·No. 61634·Unpublished

Opinion

Provider's rating. See Beal, 865 N.E.2d at 1213 ("A reading of the contract should not render any portion meaningless."). The district court therefore properly granted summary judgment in favor of respondents. 1 See Lake Constr. & Dev. Corp., 621 N.Y.S.2d at 338. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Saitta

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Ara H Shirinian, Settlement Judge Ballard Spahr, LLP Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Carson City Clerk

'In light of the parties' contract, summary judgment was also proper with respect to appellant's claim for unjust enrichment. See Leasepartners Corp. v. Robert L. Brooks Trust Dated November 12, 1975, 113 Nev. 747, 755-56, 942 P.2d 182, 187 (1997) ("An action based on a theory of unjust enrichment is not available when there is an express, written contract, because no agreement can be implied when there is an express agreement"); see also PRG Brokerage Inc. v. Aramarine Brokerage, Inc., 968 N.Y.S.2d 439, 441 (App. Div. 2013) (same).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Provider's rating. See Beal, 865 N.E.2d at 1213 ("A reading of the contract should not render any portion meaningless."). The district court therefore properly granted summary judgment in favor of respondents. 1 See Lake Constr. & Dev. Corp., 621 N.Y.S.2d at 338. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Saitta

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Ara H Shirinian, Settlement Judge Ballard Spahr, LLP Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Carson City Clerk

'In light of the parties' contract, summary judgment was also proper with respect to appellant's claim for unjust enrichment. See Leasepartners Corp. v. Robert L. Brooks Trust Dated November 12, 1975, 113 Nev. 747, 755-56, 942 P.2d 182, 187 (1997) ("An action based on a theory of unjust enrichment is not available when there is an express, written contract, because no agreement can be implied when there is an express agreement"); see also PRG Brokerage Inc. v. Aramarine Brokerage, Inc., 968 N.Y.S.2d 439, 441 (App. Div. 2013) (same).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e

Woodlands Comm. Bank v. State of Nev. Bd. of Finance, (Neb. 2015).

Pincite

Woodlands Comm. Bank v. State of Nev. Bd. of Finance (Woodlands Comm. Bank v. State of Nev. Bd. of Finance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related