Woodland v. Woodland
This text of 125 S.E. 732 (Woodland v. Woodland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Although the trial judge in his order stated that he sustained the “general” demurrer, an inspection of -the order and the demurrer clearly shows that the only effect of the order was to strike from the petition certain items of the account sued for, and to leave the suit, as to some of the items sued for, still pending in the court. It follows, that the order sustaining the so-called general demurrer was not a final judgment- in the case, and the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the bill of exceptions is granted.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 S.E. 732, 33 Ga. App. 167, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodland-v-woodland-gactapp-1924.