Woodland v. Woodland

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Woodland v. Woodland

293 So. 2d 370, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7618

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1974·No. No. 73-162·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the record on appeal and consideration of the briefs and oral argument we are of the opinion that the award of the husband’s interest in the jointly held marital dwelling, as lump sum alimony, constitutes an abuse of discretion; to that extent the final judgment is modified with the property to be held by the parties as tenants in common. See Sharpe v. Sharpe, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 665; see also F.S. Section 689.15, F.S.A. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed, except as modified.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the record on appeal and consideration of the briefs and oral argument we are of the opinion that the award of the husband’s interest in the jointly held marital dwelling, as lump sum alimony, constitutes an abuse of discretion; to that extent the final judgment is modified with the property to be held by the parties as tenants in common. See Sharpe v. Sharpe, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 665; see also F.S. Section 689.15, F.S.A. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed, except as modified.

OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Woodland v. Woodland, 293 So. 2d 370, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7618 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

293 So. 2d 370 (Woodland v. Woodland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related