Woodland v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Woodland v. State

1915 OK CR 223, 152 P. 810, 12 Okla. Crim. 163, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 23, 1915

DocketNo. A-2386.

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK CR 223 (Woodland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodland v. State, 1915 OK CR 223, 152 P. 810, 12 Okla. Crim. 163, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220 (Okla. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

*164 ARMSTRONG, J.

The plaintiff in error, George Woodland, was convicted at the May, 1914, adjourned term of the District Court of Payne county on a charge of maintaining a place wherein intoxicating liquors were kept for sale, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $700.00 .and imprisonment in the state penitentiary -for a term of five years. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error. It is suggested by counsel that the acting Governor granted a pardon to plaintiff in error subsequent to the filing of the appeal in this court, and that the appeal had been abandoned. There being no further reason why the cause should receive further consideration at the hands of this court, the appeal is dismissed.

DOYLE, P. J., concurs; FURMAN, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*164 ARMSTRONG, J.

The plaintiff in error, George Woodland, was convicted at the May, 1914, adjourned term of the District Court of Payne county on a charge of maintaining a place wherein intoxicating liquors were kept for sale, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $700.00 .and imprisonment in the state penitentiary -for a term of five years. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error. It is suggested by counsel that the acting Governor granted a pardon to plaintiff in error subsequent to the filing of the appeal in this court, and that the appeal had been abandoned. There being no further reason why the cause should receive further consideration at the hands of this court, the appeal is dismissed.

DOYLE, P. J., concurs; FURMAN, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK CR 223, 152 P. 810, 12 Okla. Crim. 163, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodland-v-state-oklacrimapp-1915.