Woodland v. Seals

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Woodland v. Seals

1923 OK 726, 218 P. 833, 92 Okla. 220, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 837

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 25, 1923

Docket11904

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK 726 (Woodland v. Seals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodland v. Seals, 1923 OK 726, 218 P. 833, 92 Okla. 220, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 837 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

The plaintiff commenced his action in the district court of Ottawa county, against the defendant for damages. Upon a trial of the cause judgment went for the plaintiff, and the defendant has brought error to this court. This cause wasi regularly submitted with notice to the plaintiff in error to prepare, serve, and file 'brief, as required by the rule of this court, which the plaintiff in error has -failed to do. If the plaintiff in error fails to prepare, serve, and file brief as required by the rule of this court after notice of the submission of the cause, the appeal will be dismissed for wtat of prosecution. Therefore, it is recommended that this cause be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

STEPHENSON, C.

The plaintiff commenced his action in the district court of Ottawa county, against the defendant for damages. Upon a trial of the cause judgment went for the plaintiff, and the defendant has brought error to this court. This cause wasi regularly submitted with notice to the plaintiff in error to prepare, serve, and file 'brief, as required by the rule of this court, which the plaintiff in error has -failed to do. If the plaintiff in error fails to prepare, serve, and file brief as required by the rule of this court after notice of the submission of the cause, the appeal will be dismissed for wtat of prosecution. Therefore, it is recommended that this cause be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK 726, 218 P. 833, 92 Okla. 220, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodland-v-seals-okla-1923.