Wooding v. . Thom
103 N.E. 1135, 209 N.Y. 583, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 973
This text of 103 N.E. 1135 (Wooding v. . Thom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wooding v. . Thom, 103 N.E. 1135, 209 N.Y. 583, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 973 (N.Y. 1913).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, to plaintiff, respondent, on appeal of defendant Thom, and with costs to defendant Scudder as against the plaintiff on the latter’s appeal; no opinion.
Concur: Culler, Oh. J., G-ray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Hogar, JJ. Not sitting: Miller, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Hoxie
133 N.W.2d 167 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1965)
Greenie v. Nashua Buick Co.
158 A. 817 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1932)
Nash v. Baun
264 P. 846 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
103 N.E. 1135, 209 N.Y. 583, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wooding-v-thom-ny-1913.