Wooding v. . Thom
103 N.E. 1135, 209 N.Y. 583, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 973
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, to plaintiff, respondent, on appeal of defendant Thom, and with costs to defendant Scudder as against the plaintiff on the latter’s appeal; no opinion.
Concur: Culler, Oh. J., G-ray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Hogar, JJ. Not sitting: Miller, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wooding v. . Thom, 103 N.E. 1135, 209 N.Y. 583, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 973 (N.Y. 1913).
103 N.E. 1135 (Wooding v. . Thom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Hoxie
133 N.W.2d 167 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1965)
Greenie v. Nashua Buick Co.
158 A. 817 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1932)
Nash v. Baun
264 P. 846 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)