Wooding v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wooding v. State

88 So. 3d 356, 2012 WL 1605246, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7218

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 2012·No. No. 3D11-3166·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Eldrick Wooding, seeks to appeal “a ruling” purportedly made on November 17, 2011, “stop[ping] the Defendant from filing his ‘pro Se’ Motion.” While our review of the record and trial court docket reflects Wooding, indeed, filed some type of pro se motion that was set for hearing for November 17, 2011, the record before us does not include the motion described by Wooding, or a written order reflecting a ruling on such motion. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal as premature.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Eldrick Wooding, seeks to appeal “a ruling” purportedly made on November 17, 2011, “stop[ping] the Defendant from filing his ‘pro Se’ Motion.” While our review of the record and trial court docket reflects Wooding, indeed, filed some type of pro se motion that was set for hearing for November 17, 2011, the record before us does not include the motion described by Wooding, or a written order reflecting a ruling on such motion. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal as premature.

Appeal dismissed.

Wooding v. State, 88 So. 3d 356, 2012 WL 1605246, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7218 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

88 So. 3d 356 (Wooding v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.