Woodin v. Scoggins Construction Co.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedFebruary 24, 2009
DocketI.C. NO. 648671.
StatusPublished

This text of Woodin v. Scoggins Construction Co. (Woodin v. Scoggins Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodin v. Scoggins Construction Co., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2009).

Opinion

***********
Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, the Full Commission finds that the appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives. The Full Commission affirms the Opinion and *Page 2 Award of the Deputy Commissioner with minor modifications and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following which were entered into by the parties before the hearing in a Pre-Trial Agreement and at the hearing as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties are subject to the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. An employee-employer relationship existed between, either, Scott Woodin and Myrick Construction, or between Scott Woodin and Ronald Scoggins; or Scott Woodin was a lent employee of Myrick Construction and Ronald Scoggins.

3. The employee's average weekly wage is to be determined.

4. The employee sustained an injury on June 1, 2006.

5. The accident arose out of and in the course of employment and is compensable.

6. The injury resulting from the compensable accident was the proximate cause of Scott Woodin's death.

7. At and subsequent to the hearing, the parties submitted the following documents as Stipulated Exhibits:

a. Stipulated Exhibit No. 1 — Medical records;

b. Stipulated Exhibit No. 2 — Death Certificate;

c. Stipulated Exhibit No. 3 — Industrial Commission filings;

d. Stipulated Exhibit No. 4 — OSHA file for Scoggins Construction Company;

e. Stipulated Exhibit No. 5 — Form 1099 for Ronald Scoggins;

f. Stipulated Exhibit No. 6 — Medical bills;

*Page 3

g. Stipulated Exhibit No. 7 — Funeral expenses;

h. Stipulated Exhibit No. 8 — Certificate of Insurance;

i. Stipulated Exhibit No. 9 — Employment application;

j. Stipulated Exhibit No. 10 — Discovery;

k. Stipulated Exhibit No. 11 — OSHA file for Myrick Construction Company;

l. Stipulated Exhibit No. 12 — Wage information;

m. Stipulated Exhibit No. 13 — Judgment of Divorce;

n. Stipulated Exhibit No. 14 — Recorded Statement of Jonathan Fritz;

o. Stipulated Exhibit No. 15 — Recorded Statement of Richard Penny;

p. Stipulated Exhibit No. 16 — Recorded Statement of Randy Fritz;

q. Stipulated Exhibit No. 17 — Recorded Statement of Robert Hobbs;

r. Stipulated Exhibit No. 18 — Recorded Statement of Billy Myrick;

s. Stipulated Exhibit No. 19 — Recorded Statement of Ronald Scoggins Vol. 1;

t. Stipulated Exhibit No. 20 — Recorded Statement of Ronald Scoggins Vol. 2;

u. Stipulated Exhibit No. 21 — Recorded Statement of John Sisk; and

v. Stipulated Exhibit No. 22 — Recorded Statement of Pete Starling.

8. The issues to be determined are as follows:

a. Whether at the time of the accident, Scott Woodin was an employee of Scoggins Construction Company, Myrick Construction Company, or both?

b. Whether Scoggins Construction Company, Myrick Construction Company, or both should pay all outstanding medical bills and death benefits, per *Page 4 N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-38, owed as a result of the admittedly compensable injury resulting in Scott Woodin's death?

***********
Based upon all the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On June 1, 2006 Scott Woodin fell approximately 15 to 20 feet and sustained a severe traumatic brain injury. He was in the hospital for approximately one week and died on June 7, 2006.

2. Prior to June 1, 2006, Scott Woodin (hereinafter "deceased employee") had been employed with Scoggins Construction Company (hereinafter "Scoggins") as a laborer and also performed work for Myrick Construction Company (hereinafter "Myrick") on multiple occasions.

3. On June 1, 2006, deceased employee was at a job site where Myrick was the general contractor responsible for framing and constructing the roof for a single-family dwelling. Myrick as the general contractor had subcontracted the siding work to Scoggins.

4. Robert Hobbs, deceased employee's co-worker at Scoggins, was employed as a laborer. He earned $15.00 per hour and worked 20 to 30 hours per week. Mr. Hobbs rode to and from work with deceased employee. Mr. Hobbs rode to work with deceased employee on June 1, 2006. Subsequent to their arrival around 7:00 a.m., deceased employee performed approximately one hour of work for Scoggins.

5. Ronald Scoggins, the owner of Scoggins, advised his employees he was going to have to let someone go, as he did not need four people working on the job. Mr. Scoggins told his son David Scoggins, Robert Hobbs and deceased employee that he was going to have to let *Page 5 deceased employee go, as there was not enough work. Mr. Hobbs testified he was under the impression deceased employee was terminated from employment.

6. Ronald Scoggins contacted Randy Fritz, the on-site supervisor for Myrick, about possible employment for deceased employee with Myrick. Mr. Hobbs witnessed Mr. Fritz hire deceased employee to work with Myrick on June 1, 2006. Mr. Hobbs also witnessed deceased employee's oral agreement to work for Myrick.

7. Deceased employee immediately began working for Myrick and worked from 8 a.m. until his fall around 4:00 p.m. Deceased employee performed roofing work for Myrick and Mr. Fritz was his onsite supervisor.

8. Mr. Fritz instructed deceased employee where to work and what to do and controlled the manner and method of deceased employee's work.

9. Upon completion of his day of work for Scoggins, Mr. Hobbs approached Mr. Fritz to see if deceased employee could leave work for the day and secured that permission. Deceased employee could not leave his employment with Myrick without the permission of Mr. Fritz, his supervisor.

10. Mr. Scoggins testified that deceased employee was performing roofing work for Myrick on June 1, 2006 and that Myrick controlled the details, manner and method of deceased employee's work.

11. Myrick provided the materials and the majority of the tools required for deceased employee to perform the roofing work for Myrick on June 1, 2006.

12. Although deceased employee had been employed with Scoggins, he had been let go by Ronald Scoggins due to lack of work on June 1, 2006, the same day he began his employment with Myrick. *Page 6

13. David Scoggins, who was the son of Ronald Scoggins and deceased employee's co-worker, confirmed that deceased employee was let go on June 1, 2006 due to the lack of work; that Myrick agreed to provide deceased employee with employment on June 1, 2006; and that deceased employee was working for Myrick on that date. He further testified that Mr. Fritz, the job supervisor for Myrick, controlled the manner and method of deceased employee's work and told deceased employee where to work and what to do.

14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. Texas Gulf, Inc.
351 S.E.2d 109 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)
Collins v. James Paul Edwards, Inc.
204 S.E.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
Henderson v. Manpower of Guilford County, Inc.
319 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Woodin v. Scoggins Construction Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodin-v-scoggins-construction-co-ncworkcompcom-2009.