Woodie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Woodie v. State

352 So. 2d 578, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16808

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 1977·No. No. 77-1036·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. See State v. Wilcox, 351 So.2d 89 (Fla.2d DCA 1977), and Massey v. State, 348 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating that appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed, as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. See State v. Wilcox, 351 So.2d 89 (Fla.2d DCA 1977), and Massey v. State, 348 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating that appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed, as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Woodie v. State, 352 So. 2d 578, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

352 So. 2d 578 (Woodie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related