Woodgett v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Woodgett v. State

117 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 699

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 12, 1928

Docket5 Div. 693.

StatusPublished

This text of 117 So. 927 (Woodgett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodgett v. State, 117 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 699 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The jury rendered a verdict of guilty as charged in the first count of the indictment. The offense therein charged was that he did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol The second count of the indictment charged the unlawful possession of a still, etc., but as to this count the verdict of the jury operated as an acquittal. The court duly sentenced the defendant to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary of not less than two years and not more than three years. There is no bill of exceptions in the transcript, and the clerk of the circuit court certifies no bill of exceptions has been filed. The appeal, therefore, is upon the record proper. This record has been examined, as the law requires; it appears regular in all respects and without error. It follows that the judgment of conviction, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The jury rendered a verdict of guilty as charged in the first count of the indictment. The offense therein charged was that he did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol The second count of the indictment charged the unlawful possession of a still, etc., but as to this count the verdict of the jury operated as an acquittal. The court duly sentenced the defendant to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary of not less than two years and not more than three years. There is no bill of exceptions in the transcript, and the clerk of the circuit court certifies no bill of exceptions has been filed. The appeal, therefore, is upon the record proper. This record has been examined, as the law requires; it appears regular in all respects and without error. It follows that the judgment of conviction, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodgett-v-state-alactapp-1928.