Woodford v. FCI Milan
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
DARRYL DOMINIC WOODFORD,
Plaintiff, Case No. 2:23-cv-13284
v. Honorable Susan K. DeClercq United States District Judge FCI MILAN et al., Honorable David R. Grand Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge ___________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 29), GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 18), AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (ECF No. 1)
On December 16, 2024, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a report. ECF No. 29, recommending that this Court grant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 18. Judge Grand provided 14 days to object, but the parties did not do so. They have therefore forfeited their right to appeal Judge Grand’s findings. See Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530–31 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). Moreover, there is no prejudicial clear error in the report. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 29, is ADOPTED. Further, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 18, is GRANTED. Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED.
This is a final order and closes the above-captioned case. /s/Susan K. DeClercq SUSAN K. DeCLERCQ United States District Judge Dated: January 14, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodford v. FCI Milan (Woodford v. FCI Milan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.