Woodfield v. Pace

566 So. 2d 949, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7270, 1990 WL 138396
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 1990·No. No. 89-3231·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the authority of Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers Nat’l Pension Fund, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 680, 107 L.Ed.2d 782 (1990). We reject appellants’ arguments based on Kwatcher v. Massachusetts Serv. Emp. Pension Fund, 879 F.2d 957 (1st Cir.1989), because they are raised for the first time on appeal. See Brickell Biscayne Corp. v. Palace Condominium Ass’n, 526 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodfield v. Pace, 566 So. 2d 949, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7270, 1990 WL 138396 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

566 So. 2d 949 (Woodfield v. Pace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund
493 U.S. 365 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Sam Giardono v. George M. Jones
867 F.2d 409 (Seventh Circuit, 1989)
McHugh v. TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILA.
638 F. Supp. 1036 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1986)
Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. v. NAT. PATIENT AIDS, INC.
427 So. 2d 1042 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Brickell Biscayne Corp. v. PALACE CONDO. ASS'N
526 So. 2d 982 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Tingle v. Dade County Board of County Com'rs
245 So. 2d 76 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Keathley v. Larson
348 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Dodd v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
688 F. Supp. 564 (E.D. California, 1988)