Woodfield v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Woodfield v. Maass

768 P.2d 401, 95 Or. App. 383

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 22, 1989

Docket87-C-10345; CA A47445

StatusPublished

This text of 768 P.2d 401 (Woodfield v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodfield v. Maass, 768 P.2d 401, 95 Or. App. 383 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appealed a judgment denying him relief on the merits in this habeas corpus proceeding. We affirmed without opinion. 94 Or App 564, 767 P2d 120 (1988).

We allow his petition for reconsideration, because the writ should have been dismissed without reaching the merits. Keenan v. Peterson, 307 Or 323, 767 P2d 441 (1989).

Petition for reconsideration allowed; former decision withdrawn; remanded with instructions to dismiss the writ of habeas corpus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appealed a judgment denying him relief on the merits in this habeas corpus proceeding. We affirmed without opinion. 94 Or App 564, 767 P2d 120 (1988).

We allow his petition for reconsideration, because the writ should have been dismissed without reaching the merits. Keenan v. Peterson, 307 Or 323, 767 P2d 441 (1989).

Petition for reconsideration allowed; former decision withdrawn; remanded with instructions to dismiss the writ of habeas corpus.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

768 P.2d 401, 95 Or. App. 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodfield-v-maass-orctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack