Wooden v. State
This text of 187 So. 2d 910 (Wooden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was informed against, charged with unlawful possession of narcotic drug, and with another offense. He pleaded not guilty, waived a jury, was tried before the court, acquitted of the latter charge and found guilty of the former. At trial he was represented by an attorney of the public defender’s office. While serving sentence he moved for relief under criminal procedure Rule No, 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The trial court denied the motion summarily, and this appeal followed. We have reviewed the grounds of the motion in the light of the record and briefs, and conclude as did the trial court that no showing was made to entitle the defendant to relief from the judgment and sentence.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 So. 2d 910, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wooden-v-state-fladistctapp-1966.