Wooden v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 30, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-06710·Unknown

Opinion

uspcspsy—(‘i‘isés@rY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | DOC #: nnnnn nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn X DATE FILED: 113072020. ANTHONY WOODEN, Plaintiff, 19-CV-06710 (SN) -against- ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

nnn enn eX

SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On November 9, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States granted the petitions for writ of certiorari in Carr v. Saul, 961 F.3d 1267 (10th Cir. 2020), and Davis v. Saul, 963 F.3d 790 (8th Cir. 2020), which presented the question: Whether claimants seeking disability benefits under the Social Security Act must exhaust Appointments Clause challenges before the Administrative Law Judge as a prerequisite to obtaining judicial review. See cert. granted Carr v. Saul, 592 U.S. _, No. 19-1442, 2020 WL 6551771, (Nov. 9, 2020) (consolidating both cases). Accordingly, the Court directs the parties to meet and confer, and to file a joint letter with the Court no later than December 14, 2020, describing whether the parties agree to a stay in this case pending the outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision on the issue. SO ORDERED. abe: NETBURN United States Magistrate Judge DATED: New York, New York November 30, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wooden v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Wooden v. Commissioner of Social Security (Wooden v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carr v. Commissioner, SSA
961 F.3d 1267 (Tenth Circuit, 2020)
John Davis v. Andrew Saul
963 F.3d 790 (Eighth Circuit, 2020)