Woodcock v. Colvin

Fourth Circuit

Woodcock v. Colvin

578 F. App'x 241

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2014·No. No. 13-2329·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Betty Woodcock appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodcock v. Astrue, No. 2:12-cv-00474-AWA-TEM, 2013 WL 4714407 (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Betty Woodcock appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woodcock v. Astrue, No. 2:12-cv-00474-AWA-TEM, 2013 WL 4714407 (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Woodcock v. Colvin, 578 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

578 F. App'x 241 (Woodcock v. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.