Woodcock v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Woodcock v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

258 A.D. 738, 14 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6711

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 738 (Woodcock v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodcock v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 258 A.D. 738, 14 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a preference. Order reversed on the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, the case to be set for trial during the October, 1939, term of the court on a day to be fixed by the justice presiding in the calendar part thereof. In our opinion, in the exercises of sound discretion the preference should have been granted for the October, 1939, term. The plaintiff’s age and physical condition warrant the granting of the preference. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a preference. Order reversed on the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, the case to be set for trial during the October, 1939, term of the court on a day to be fixed by the justice presiding in the calendar part thereof. In our opinion, in the exercises of sound discretion the preference should have been granted for the October, 1939, term. The plaintiff’s age and physical condition warrant the granting of the preference. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 738, 14 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodcock-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1939.