Woodby v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

473 F. Supp. 502, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12248
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee
DecidedMay 22, 1979
DocketCiv. Nos. 3-79-157, 3-79-165
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 473 F. Supp. 502 (Woodby v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodby v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad, 473 F. Supp. 502, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12248 (E.D. Tenn. 1979).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

Defendant has moved to dismiss these two cases for failure to state a cause of action. In both cases, plaintiffs were discharged from employment by the defendant and were subsequently reinstated without loss of seniority due to the discharge by order of the National Railroad Adjustment Board. However, the Board, as the statutorily designated arbiter of employer-employee disputes in the railroad industry, decided that the defendant railroad did not have to reimburse plaintiffs for the wages lost due to the discharge. In these cases, plaintiffs are pursuing a common law contract claim for these lost wages under this Court’s diversity jurisdiction.

Title 45 U.S.C. Section 153(m) plainly states that decisions of the National Railroad Adjustment Board are final and binding on both parties. Just as the railroad has to reinstate plaintiffs with full seniority under the Board’s decision, the employees have to accept the Board’s decision not to award lost wages. Judicial review of Board decisions is narrowly limited to certain questions by the Railway Labor Act, 45 [503]*503U.S.C. Section 153(q). Plaintiffs cannot avoid the provisions of the Act and the finality of the Board decision by pursuing a common law contract claim in this Court. The complaint fails to state a cause of action.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss these complaints be, and the same hereby is sustained.

Order Accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Continental Airlines Corp.
64 B.R. 858 (S.D. Texas, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F. Supp. 502, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodby-v-louisville-nashville-railroad-tned-1979.