Woodbury v. Whiting

44 A. 385, 68 N.H. 607
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1895·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Parsons, J.

The jury could not have found for the defendant If they had not found that the defendant did not speak the words alleged. Wier v. Allen, 51 N. H. 177, 180. If the defendant did not make the charge alleged as the slander, it is of no consequence whether the evidence excepted to was or was not competent upon the question of damages. The case presents no reason for the consideration of that question. Wier v. Allen, supra.

Exception overruled.

Clark., J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodbury v. Whiting, 44 A. 385, 68 N.H. 607 (N.H. 1895).

44 A. 385 (Woodbury v. Whiting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Small v. Saunders
129 A. 270 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1925)
Twarog v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.
113 A. 224 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1921)
Kuba v. Devonshire Mills
99 A. 91 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1916)