Woodbury v. Whiting

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Woodbury v. Whiting

44 A. 385, 68 N.H. 607

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 44 A. 385 (Woodbury v. Whiting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodbury v. Whiting, 44 A. 385, 68 N.H. 607 (N.H. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Parsons, J.

The jury could not have found for the defendant If they had not found that the defendant did not speak the words alleged. Wier v. Allen, 51 N. H. 177, 180. If the defendant did not make the charge alleged as the slander, it is of no consequence whether the evidence excepted to was or was not competent upon the question of damages. The case presents no reason for the consideration of that question. Wier v. Allen, supra.

Exception overruled.

Clark., J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parsons, J.

The jury could not have found for the defendant If they had not found that the defendant did not speak the words alleged. Wier v. Allen, 51 N. H. 177, 180. If the defendant did not make the charge alleged as the slander, it is of no consequence whether the evidence excepted to was or was not competent upon the question of damages. The case presents no reason for the consideration of that question. Wier v. Allen, supra.

Exception overruled.

Clark., J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A. 385, 68 N.H. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodbury-v-whiting-nh-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack