Woodbury v. Whiting
44 A. 385, 68 N.H. 607
Opinion
The jury could not have found for the defendant If they had not found that the defendant did not speak the words alleged. Wier v. Allen, 51 N. H. 177, 180. If the defendant did not make the charge alleged as the slander, it is of no consequence whether the evidence excepted to was or was not competent upon the question of damages. The case presents no reason for the consideration of that question. Wier v. Allen, supra.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodbury v. Whiting, 44 A. 385, 68 N.H. 607 (N.H. 1895).
44 A. 385 (Woodbury v. Whiting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Small v. Saunders
129 A. 270 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1925)
Twarog v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.
113 A. 224 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1921)
Kuba v. Devonshire Mills
99 A. 91 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1916)