Woodbury v. Henning
596 So. 2d 798, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4136, 1992 WL 69031
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 1992·No. No. 92-0270·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on his motion for belated rehearing of the trial court’s order denying his rule 3.800(a) motion for correction of sentence.
The trial court has an obligation to enter a ruling on the motion for rehearing even though the motion is evidently untimely. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to rule on the motion. If it is untimely, it should be stricken by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodbury v. Henning, 596 So. 2d 798, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4136, 1992 WL 69031 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
596 So. 2d 798 (Woodbury v. Henning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
HENRY MCCONE vs PITNEY BOWES, INC. AND EXELA ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, INC.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
Taylor v. Metropolitan Dade County
596 So. 2d 798 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)