Woodbury v. Garrity
This text of 229 A.D. 746 (Woodbury v. Garrity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, in so far as it decrees the invalidity of the mortgage held by appellants Schrage and Schodnick reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and judgment directed declaring that said mortgage is valid. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the proof is insufficient to charge the mortgagees with notice or knowledge of Gray’s fraud. Findings of fact and ednelusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.D. 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodbury-v-garrity-nyappdiv-1930.