Woodbury v. County Commissioners

40 Me. 304
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1885·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Rice, J.

Petitions for writs of mandamus are addressed to the judicial discretion of the Court. Proprietors of St. Luke’s Church v. Slack & als., 7 Cush. 227. Such writs will be denied when, if granted, they would be wholly unavailing. Williams, Pet., v. County Commissioners, 35 Maine, 345.

County treasurers are elected for one year only. Before any eifectual action could be had in this case, if the writ should be granted, the term for which the petitioner claims to have been elected, will have expired. Under similar circumstances, and for this reason, a writ was denied in the case of Howard v. Gage, 6 Mass. 462.

There were many other reasons presented at the argument, for the consideration of the Court, against granting the writ, but deeming this decisive it becomes unnecessary to examine them.

Writ denied and Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodbury v. County Commissioners, 40 Me. 304 (Me. 1885).

40 Me. 304 (Woodbury v. County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Case v. Lyons
143 Ala. 649 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1904)
State ex rel. Goodnow v. Police Commissioners
80 Mo. App. 206 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)
State ex rel. Hughlett v. Finley
74 Mo. App. 213 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)
Boody v. Watson
9 A. 794 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1886)