Woodbury v. County Commissioners

40 Me. 304
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 40 Me. 304 (Woodbury v. County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodbury v. County Commissioners, 40 Me. 304 (Me. 1885).

Opinion

Rice, J.

Petitions for writs of mandamus are addressed to the judicial discretion of the Court. Proprietors of St. Luke’s Church v. Slack & als., 7 Cush. 227. Such writs will be denied when, if granted, they would be wholly unavailing. Williams, Pet., v. County Commissioners, 35 Maine, 345.

County treasurers are elected for one year only. Before any eifectual action could be had in this case, if the writ should be granted, the term for which the petitioner claims to have been elected, will have expired. Under similar circumstances, and for this reason, a writ was denied in the case of Howard v. Gage, 6 Mass. 462.

There were many other reasons presented at the argument, for the consideration of the Court, against granting the writ, but deeming this decisive it becomes unnecessary to examine them.

Writ denied and Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Case v. Lyons
143 Ala. 649 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1904)
State ex rel. Goodnow v. Police Commissioners
80 Mo. App. 206 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)
State ex rel. Hughlett v. Finley
74 Mo. App. 213 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)
Boody v. Watson
9 A. 794 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Me. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodbury-v-county-commissioners-me-1885.