Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.

S.D. New York

Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.

14 F.2d 956, 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1425

DecidedSeptember 22, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 14 F.2d 956 (Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co., 14 F.2d 956, 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1425 (S.D.N.Y. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

TEACHER, District Judge.

On defendant’s motion to transfer the cause to the equity side of the court, and plaintiff’s motion to require the defendant to answer the separate' defense alleged in its reply to defendant ’s counterclaim.

The equitable defenses interposed by the answer convert this proceeding from one at law to 'one in equity, “with all the consequences flowing therefrom.” The equitable issues, therefore, are to be first disposed of “as in a court of equity,” and the proper practice is to order “the cause trans[957]*957ferred to the equity side of the court. Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon Bank, 260 U. S. 235, 43 S. Ct. 118, 67 L. Ed. 232. Section 274b of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1251b) provides that where, in an action at law, equitable defenses are pleaded and affirmative relief in equity is prayed, the plaintiff shall file a replication. The interposition of the equitable defense, not the formal transfer to the equity side of the court, converts the proceeding to one in equity, and thereafter the pleadings are governed by the Judicial Code and the equity rules.

Neither the statute nor the rules contemplate a reply to a replication. By interrogatories the plaintiff may force the admission or denial of facts alleged in support of the defense of res ad judicata interposed in its reply, and when that has been done may, perhaps, be in a position, either by motion to dismiss or for a separate hearing of the issues raised by this defense, to dispose of the equitable issues before the trial of the case presented by the counterclaim.

The result is that the defendant’s motion for an order transferring the cause to the equity side of the court must be granted, and the plaintiff’s motion for an order requiring the defendant to serve a verified answer to the separate defense contained in the plaintiff’s reply must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEACHER, District Judge.

On defendant’s motion to transfer the cause to the equity side of the court, and plaintiff’s motion to require the defendant to answer the separate' defense alleged in its reply to defendant ’s counterclaim.

The equitable defenses interposed by the answer convert this proceeding from one at law to 'one in equity, “with all the consequences flowing therefrom.” The equitable issues, therefore, are to be first disposed of “as in a court of equity,” and the proper practice is to order “the cause trans[957]*957ferred to the equity side of the court. Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon Bank, 260 U. S. 235, 43 S. Ct. 118, 67 L. Ed. 232. Section 274b of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1251b) provides that where, in an action at law, equitable defenses are pleaded and affirmative relief in equity is prayed, the plaintiff shall file a replication. The interposition of the equitable defense, not the formal transfer to the equity side of the court, converts the proceeding to one in equity, and thereafter the pleadings are governed by the Judicial Code and the equity rules.

Neither the statute nor the rules contemplate a reply to a replication. By interrogatories the plaintiff may force the admission or denial of facts alleged in support of the defense of res ad judicata interposed in its reply, and when that has been done may, perhaps, be in a position, either by motion to dismiss or for a separate hearing of the issues raised by this defense, to dispose of the equitable issues before the trial of the case presented by the counterclaim.

The result is that the defendant’s motion for an order transferring the cause to the equity side of the court must be granted, and the plaintiff’s motion for an order requiring the defendant to serve a verified answer to the separate defense contained in the plaintiff’s reply must be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 F.2d 956, 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodbury-v-andrew-jergens-co-nysd-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack