Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.

16 F.2d 130, 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1568
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedNovember 18, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 F.2d 130 (Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co., 16 F.2d 130, 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1568 (E.D.N.Y. 1926).

Opinion

INCH, District Judge.

This is a motion for an order overruling an objection to interrogatories. The defendant has objected to answering any interrogatories because the complaint prays for treble damages.

Defendant is a corporation. The suit is in equity, and is. apparently for violations of trade-mark and unfair competition. The defendant has answered.. Aside from a doubt as to any recovery on treble damages, I prefer to follow the’ only decision I can find in this circuit. Grasselli Co. v. National Co. (D. C.) 282 F. 379. The case of Best Foods v. Hemphill Packing Co. (D. C.) 300 F. 642, was in the Third circuit.

Objection overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

H. Wagner & Adler Co. v. Mali
74 F.2d 666 (Second Circuit, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F.2d 130, 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodbury-v-andrew-jergens-co-nyed-1926.