Woodbury Transportation, Inc. v. Associated Brokerage Center, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Woodbury Transportation, Inc. v. Associated Brokerage Center, Inc.

289 A.D.2d 401, 734 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12191

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 289 A.D.2d 401 (Woodbury Transportation, Inc. v. Associated Brokerage Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodbury Transportation, Inc. v. Associated Brokerage Center, Inc., 289 A.D.2d 401, 734 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence in failing to add a vehicle to an insurance policy, the defendant, Associated Brokerage Center, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated May 8, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

“It is axiomatic that liability for negligence will not attach absent proof that the negligence was the proximate cause of the harm sued upon” (Resource Fin. v National Cas. Co., 219 AD2d 627, 628). The Supreme Court erred in denying the appellant’s motion for summary judgment, since the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that its damages were proximately caused by any negligence on the part of the appellant. S. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence in failing to add a vehicle to an insurance policy, the defendant, Associated Brokerage Center, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated May 8, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

“It is axiomatic that liability for negligence will not attach absent proof that the negligence was the proximate cause of the harm sued upon” (Resource Fin. v National Cas. Co., 219 AD2d 627, 628). The Supreme Court erred in denying the appellant’s motion for summary judgment, since the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that its damages were proximately caused by any negligence on the part of the appellant. S. Miller, J. P., Friedmann, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 401, 734 N.Y.S.2d 898, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodbury-transportation-inc-v-associated-brokerage-center-inc-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack