Woodburn v. Jones

134 S.E. 748, 102 W. Va. 191, 1926 W. Va. LEXIS 103
West Virginia Supreme Court·Decided September 21, 1926·No. 5303·Published

Opinion

*192 Litz, President :

This is an 'action of trespass on the case for malpractice. On the trial the court directed a verdict for the defendant, and entered judgment for costs in favor of the defendant. Prom the judgment the plaintiff obtained a writ of error. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the writ as having been improvidently awarded.

As the trial court did not enter a judgment of nil capia! the order was not final, and the motion must be sustained. Hunt v. Mounts, 96 W. Va. 143; Kirk v. Camden Interstate Railway Co., 66 W. Va. 486.

Dismissed as improvidently awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodburn v. Jones, 134 S.E. 748, 102 W. Va. 191, 1926 W. Va. LEXIS 103 (W. Va. 1926).

134 S.E. 748 (Woodburn v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunt v. Mounts
122 S.E. 464 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1924)
Kirk v. Camden Interstate Railway Co.
66 S.E. 683 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1909)