Woodburn v. City of Henderson

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided December 27, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-01488·Unknown

Opinion

MONTGOMERY Y. PAEK, ESQ., Bar # 10176 ETHAN D. THOMAS, ESQ., Bar # 12874 EMILS. KIM, ESQ., Bar # 14894 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 Telephone: 702.862.8800 Fax No.: 702.862.8811 Email: mpaek@littler.com Email: edthomas@littler.com Email: ekim@littler.com g Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF HENDERSON

DISTRICT OF NEVADA KELLY WOODBURN, THOMAS Case No. 2:19-cv-01488-JAD-VCF WOODBURN, and JOSHUA RODRIGUEZ individually and on behalf ofall others similarly situated, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. CITY OF HENDERSON; DOES I through V, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS 7 through V, inclusive, Defendants. Plaintiffs KELLY WOODBURN, THOMAS WOODBURN, and JOSHUA RODRIGUEZ (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and Defendant CITY OF HENDERSON ("Defendant"), (collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that in order to protect the confidentiality of information produced by the parties in connection with this case, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Any party may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the relevant page or labeling the item or as otherwise set forth herein) any item, piece of information, document or response to

discovery, which that party considers in good faith to contain information involving personal and confidential information of third-parties or non-parties, trade secrets, sensitive and/or confidential medical, sensitive and confidential information related to Corrections Officer safety, business or financial information of the Parties, or addresses and other contact information of Corrections Officers that is subject to protection under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Nevada law (“Confidential Information”). Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on which Confidential Information appears shall be so designated. 2. A Party may designate documents, items, or information disclosed during a deposition, in response to written discovery as “confidential” by so indicating in said response or on the record at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of such material. Additionally, a Party may designate in writing, within fourteen (14) days after receipt of said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that specific pages of the transcript and/or specific responses be treated as Confidential Information. Any other Party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the Parties shall follow the procedures described in paragraph 8 below. After any designation made according to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures described in paragraph 8 below, and counsel for all Parties shall be responsible for making all previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the “CONFIDENTIAL” designation. 3. All Confidential Information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than information that is publicly available) shall be used by the Party to whom the information is produced solely for the purpose of this case. 4. Except with the prior written consent of other Parties, or upon prior order of this Court obtained upon notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information marked “CONFIDENTIAL” shall not be disclosed to any person other than: (a) the Parties and counsel for the respective Parties to this litigation, including in- house counsel and co-counsel retained for this litigation; (b) employees of such counsel; 2.

] (c) any officer or employee of a Party, to the extent deemed necessary by counsel for the prosecution or defense of this litigation; (d) consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification annexed to this Stipulated Protective Order as Exhibit A (which shall be retained by counsel to the Party so disclosing the Confidential Information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the pendency or after the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of the Court) before being shown or given any Confidential Information; (e) any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; (f) the Court, Court personnel, and court reporters; and (g) witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(e)). A witness shall sign the Exhibit A Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential Information may be disclosed to a witness who will not sign the Certification only in a deposition at which the Party who designated the Confidential Information is represented or has been given notice that Confidential Information shall be designated “Confidential” pursuant to paragraph 2 above. Witnesses shown Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. 5. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set forth ] herein. 6. No Party shall file or submit for filing as part of the court record any document under seal without first obtaining leave of court. A Party seeking to file a document with any court with Confidential Information under seal must file a motion to seal that complies with the requirements of Nevada state and federal law including LR JA 10-5 and the directives set forth in Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). 7. A Party may designate as “confidential” documents or discovery materials produced by a non-party by providing written notice to all Parties of the relevant document numbers or other identification within thirty (30) days after receiving such documents or discovery materials. Any Party 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodburn v. City of Henderson, (D. Nev. 2021).

Woodburn v. City of Henderson (Woodburn v. City of Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)