Woodburn v. Baum

Appellate Court of Illinois

Woodburn v. Baum

39 Ill. App. 269, 1891 Ill. App. LEXIS 4

DecidedJune 25, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 39 Ill. App. 269 (Woodburn v. Baum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodburn v. Baum, 39 Ill. App. 269, 1891 Ill. App. LEXIS 4 (Ill. Ct. App. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellees have failed to file any brief in this case as required by rule 26 of this court, and in accordance with rule 27, the judgment of the court below ma)7be reversed and the cause remanded in our discretion. We are requested by attorney for appellant to reverse the judgment and remand the cause, in pursuance of such rule 27. It is therefore ordered that the judgment- in the above entitled cause rendered by the Circuit Court be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and reinanded.

Judge Cartwright, having tried the case below, took no part in the decision here.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellees have failed to file any brief in this case as required by rule 26 of this court, and in accordance with rule 27, the judgment of the court below ma)7be reversed and the cause remanded in our discretion. We are requested by attorney for appellant to reverse the judgment and remand the cause, in pursuance of such rule 27. It is therefore ordered that the judgment- in the above entitled cause rendered by the Circuit Court be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and reinanded.

Judge Cartwright, having tried the case below, took no part in the decision here.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Ill. App. 269, 1891 Ill. App. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodburn-v-baum-illappct-1891.