Woodbine Manufacturing Co. v. Deem ex rel. Estate of Deem

548 P.2d 452, 89 N.M. 172
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided April 22, 1976·No. No. 10823·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI DECISION

The district court granted Woodbine’s 41(b) motion (§ 21-1-1(41) (b) N.M.S.A. 1953) at the close of Deem’s case, made findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment in favor of the former.

Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals handed down an opinion authored by Sutin, J., in which Lopez, J. concurred and from which Hernandez, J. dissented, reversing the district court and remanding the case with directions. Deem v. Woodbine Manufacturing Company, 89 N.M. 50, 546 P.2d 1207 (1976). We granted certiorari.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals is disapproved. We direct that it not be cited as precedent.

The Court of Appeals is reversed. The district court is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodbine Manufacturing Co. v. Deem ex rel. Estate of Deem, 548 P.2d 452, 89 N.M. 172 (N.M. 1976).

548 P.2d 452 (Woodbine Manufacturing Co. v. Deem ex rel. Estate of Deem) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chairez v. James Hamilton Construction Co.
2009 NMCA 093 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2009)
Novak v. Piggly Wiggly Puget Sound Co.
591 P.2d 791 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1979)
Skyhook Corp. v. Jasper
560 P.2d 934 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1977)