Woodard v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Woodard v. State

196 So. 486, 143 Fla. 254, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1185

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 28, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On writ of error we review judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of a cow.

Examination and consideration of the entire record discloses no reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On writ of error we review judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of a cow.

Examination and consideration of the entire record discloses no reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Woodard v. State, 196 So. 486, 143 Fla. 254, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1185 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

196 So. 486 (Woodard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.