Woodard v. State

196 So. 486, 143 Fla. 254, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1185
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 28, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 486 (Woodard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodard v. State, 196 So. 486, 143 Fla. 254, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1185 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On writ of error we review judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of a cow.

Examination and consideration of the entire record discloses no reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 So. 486, 143 Fla. 254, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodard-v-state-fla-1940.