Woodard v. Glenn
This text of 245 S.E.2d 42 (Woodard v. Glenn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A garnishment proceeding against her former husband, LeRoy Anthony Woodard, was instituted on behalf of Martha Glenn by her attorney, J. Steve Cheatwood, he making the affidavit. It was based on a judgment obtained against Woodard for alimony and child support. Woodard traversed the affidavit for garnishment [753]*753by alleging it to be untrue or legally insufficient. After hearing, the trial court adjudged the judgment to be valid, due and unpaid, and denied the traverse.
At the hearing, Mrs. Glenn testified unequivocally that Woodard was not then indebted to her in any amount, that at some time in the past he had been indebted to her, that she and he had resolved that indebtedness by mutual agreement, and that she did not now consider that Woodard owes her anything.1
That being the uncontradicted testimony of the party in whose name the garnishment proceeding was instituted, it was error to deny the traverse.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 S.E.2d 42, 145 Ga. App. 752, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodard-v-glenn-gactapp-1978.