Woodard v. Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary Living Conditions But Didn't (B.C.D.C.)

Fourth Circuit

Woodard v. Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary Living Conditions But Didn't (B.C.D.C.)

47 F. App'x 242

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2002·No. No. 02-7033·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jameel Woodard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Woodard v. [243] Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary Living Conditions But Didn’t (B.C.D.C.), No. CA-01-2465-AW (D. Md. June 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jameel Woodard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Woodard v. [243] Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary Living Conditions But Didn’t (B.C.D.C.), No. CA-01-2465-AW (D. Md. June 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Woodard v. Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary Living Conditions But Didn't (B.C.D.C.), 47 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

47 F. App'x 242 (Woodard v. Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary Living Conditions But Didn't (B.C.D.C.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related