Woodard v. Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary Living Conditions But Didn't (B.C.D.C.)
This text of 47 F. App'x 242 (Woodard v. Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary Living Conditions But Didn't (B.C.D.C.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jameel Woodard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Woodard v. [243]*243Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary Living Conditions But Didn’t (B.C.D.C.), No. CA-01-2465-AW (D. Md. June 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 F. App'x 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodard-v-everyone-who-could-have-stopped-my-unsanitary-living-conditions-ca4-2002.