Woodard v. Boeing Employees Credit Union
This text of Woodard v. Boeing Employees Credit Union (Woodard v. Boeing Employees Credit Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7
8 NOEL WOODARD, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00033-RSL 9 Plaintiff, v. 10
11 BOEING EMPLOYEES’ CREDIT UNION, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY et al., 12
Defendants. 13
15 This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant Boeing Employees’ Credit 16 Union’s Motion to Stay Discovery.” Dkt. # 14. The motion is unopposed. A stay of 17 discovery while the legal issues related to the adequacy of plaintiff’s allegations is 18 necessary to promote efficiency and avoid undue burden and expense. Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 26(c). BECU has identified “a real question” regarding the viability of the claims asserted 20 against it, and plaintiff has not shown that she will be prejudiced if a stay is ordered. Wood 21 v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 1981). Discovery is hereby STAYED as to BECU. 22 23 Dated this 28th day of February, 2023.
25 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 26 ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Woodard v. Boeing Employees Credit Union, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodard-v-boeing-employees-credit-union-wawd-2023.