Woodard, Matthew Vincent

Opinion

976-/5 ORIGINAL r:/[gull o£ CA*t«Zt^\ AffefrU o/ T*x*h

MaJ QjQttei yrt/1-HluO KMacwtrl ($is> j>g) jlejgum-t A &e ytcc^ at rh?<, ftcfrS-hV fo>/L ^Mr-fTorvAty fl^y?eu) X Fv^ci ;e fctytWiw^ \v^ WeXt^ To ^

„ RECEIVED/N C.aURT-GF-eR/W,NAUpp^3- FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS SEP-29^§jr c-CTo.r-uva Abe!AcosfasQler!- Abel Acosta, Clerk

bft/

ktCXnu-ikX

(JArris £e>trrtyt 7e//?s feol f^/ikV?^ Sin-frf fcoe? [JdJi-fo/i)

fllbrtV&uJ y\AC**>r UoedUrA

£amkeJ^^A_fiJpejhor^ l.fl "ftif CAUxXfo- (Loun%e.[ fl-t Tg?fr) "Thuj/Wb "5 U

.^ikUiiei^ jJi>i^_Jj^C-/Jl^0jft-^i^ Ca%&&

5 ^ f zA rvs-5 J__^____:j?1^^3.Z;3 6u 3/ V'i'b t-c^cM^- AfiP Zo\r> Jk(^_iZ.5y/^eL.^q_..ScJ _,_/ -71H T. app ./_*>-.;

X__^__>__j/^^^ ..__.

1 ' flfrf nsi Mfa) zz,q-

J^£JL-J&uLJ$tete&.