Woodall v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Woodall v. State

285 S.E.2d 582, 159 Ga. App. 832, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2837

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 6, 1981

Docket62635

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 285 S.E.2d 582 (Woodall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodall v. State, 285 S.E.2d 582, 159 Ga. App. 832, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2837 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Quillian, Chief Judge.

The defendant appeals his convictions on two counts — one for aggravated assault with intent to rob and the second for aggravated assault. Held:

The sole basis for reversal urged on appeal concerns the sufficiency of the evidence. From an examination of the transcript, according to the defendant and one of his witnesses, he was not present at the scene of the attempted robbery; while, on the other hand, the state’s witness positively identified him. Applying the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560), a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of the offenses charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Chief Judge.

The defendant appeals his convictions on two counts — one for aggravated assault with intent to rob and the second for aggravated assault. Held:

The sole basis for reversal urged on appeal concerns the sufficiency of the evidence. From an examination of the transcript, according to the defendant and one of his witnesses, he was not present at the scene of the attempted robbery; while, on the other hand, the state’s witness positively identified him. Applying the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560), a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of the offenses charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 S.E.2d 582, 159 Ga. App. 832, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodall-v-state-gactapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack