Woodall v. State

60 So. 3d 1104, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6051, 2011 WL 1601462
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Woodall v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9210
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 29, 2011·No. 1D11-0668·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner filed a motion to modify his sentence in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The trial court denied the motion as untimely. We treat the petitioner’s notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari and deny the petition. See Platt v. State, 890 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Davis v. State, 745 So.2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

DENIED.

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodall v. State, 60 So. 3d 1104, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6051, 2011 WL 1601462 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

60 So. 3d 1104 (Woodall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
745 So. 2d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Platt v. State
890 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)