Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Woodall v. State

Woodall v. State

60 So. 3d 1104, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6051, 2011 WL 1601462
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 29, 2011
Docket1D11-0668
StatusPublished

This text of 60 So. 3d 1104 (Woodall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodall v. State, 60 So. 3d 1104, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6051, 2011 WL 1601462 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner filed a motion to modify his sentence in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The trial court denied the motion as untimely. We treat the petitioner’s notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari and deny the petition. See Platt v. State, 890 So.2d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Davis v. State, 745 So.2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

DENIED.

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
745 So. 2d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Platt v. State
890 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 So. 3d 1104, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6051, 2011 WL 1601462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodall-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.