Woodall v. Pharr

Supreme Court of Georgia

Woodall v. Pharr

162 S.E.2d 357, 224 Ga. 492, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 829

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 2, 1968

Docket24646

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 162 S.E.2d 357 (Woodall v. Pharr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodall v. Pharr, 162 S.E.2d 357, 224 Ga. 492, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 829 (Ga. 1968).

Pincite

Opinions

Frankum, Justice.

This case is before this court upon the grant of writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals. See Woodall v. Pharr, 117 Ga. App. 405. (160 SE2d 656) where the relevant facts are fully set forth. The Court of Appeals, in affirming the judgment of the trial court, based its opinion and judgment squarely on the ruling of this court in McDougald v. Dougherty, 11 Ga. 570, 588, which ruling was re-iterated by this court on the subsequent appearance of the same case at 14 Ga. 674. We can see no distinction between the point ruled upon in those cases and the question here presented. Following the rulings in those cases, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Mobley and Undercofler, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frankum, Justice.

This case is before this court upon the grant of writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals. See Woodall v. Pharr, 117 Ga. App. 405. (160 SE2d 656) where the relevant facts are fully set forth. The Court of Appeals, in affirming the judgment of the trial court, based its opinion and judgment squarely on the ruling of this court in McDougald v. Dougherty, 11 Ga. 570, 588, which ruling was re-iterated by this court on the subsequent appearance of the same case at 14 Ga. 674. We can see no distinction between the point ruled upon in those cases and the question here presented. Following the rulings in those cases, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Mobley and Undercofler, JJ., who dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 S.E.2d 357, 224 Ga. 492, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodall-v-pharr-ga-1968.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack