Woodall v. Farmers Bank

130 S.E. 832, 34 Ga. App. 680, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 483
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1925
Docket16832
StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E. 832 (Woodall v. Farmers Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodall v. Farmers Bank, 130 S.E. 832, 34 Ga. App. 680, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 483 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Brotles, O. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodnoorth, JJ., concur. Reagan & Reagan, for plaintiffs in error. E. 0. Dobbs, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 S.E. 832, 34 Ga. App. 680, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodall-v-farmers-bank-gactapp-1925.